Besires Theory is Fully Consistant with the Humean View Essay -- Ethic

Unique One Humean see holds that inspiration requires convictions and wants, which are discrete and unmistakable mental states. Convictions are arranged to fit the world, and wants are arranged to make the world fit them. This view is thought to dispense with besire hypothesis, as per which moral decisions have both a world-mind bearing of fit by speaking to the moral realities of the issue, what's more, a psyche world bearing of fit by spurring activity as needs be. Here I contend that besires are completely steady with the Humean see. The Humean view ought to be thrown at the degree of types, while besire hypothesis is upheld by contemplation on mental tokens. Existent Humean contentions against besires don't experience, and besire hypothesis stays a practical optionâ€indeed, the choice best bolstered by the evidenceâ€without dismissing the Humean see. 1 A Case for Besires As per the Humean perspective on inspiration, convictions alone can't propel. Agreeing besire theory,1 some first individual good (decisions of the structure ‘I ethically should ÃŽ ¦Ã¢â‚¬â„¢) are both conviction like and want like in that they speak to things as they ethically may be, and rouse fitting activities. For instance, on besire hypothesis my judgment ‘I should visit my grandma in the hospital’ can both speak to a verifiable good commitment and spur me to visit my grandma without the assistance of some different want type mental state. Will besire hypothesis be correct? Not under the Humean see, for on that see besire hypothesis erroneously traits motivationally hot, want like properties to a specific class of convictions. It would appear that our choices are profoundly compelled: possibly we grasp the Humean see, and describe first individual good decisions as give a false representation of... ...o fundamental associations between unmistakable mental state tokens, simpliciter internalism involves besire hypothesis. 12 Shafer-Landau contends for a comparable position, however he calls a few convictions â€Å"intrinsically† rousing. Shafer-Landau 2004, 147-48. 13 Only when we join besire hypothesis with an essentialist guarantee, for instance, that no state considers a besire except if it really rouses, do we get the outcome that ethical decisions fundamentally propel. This essentialist guarantee is unreasonably solid for any craving type state, for even occurent, typical wants joined with applicable methods related convictions can neglect to understand their utilitarian job. 14 One may feel that the standard subjective perspective on moral decisions avoids the weight of indicating how moral inspiration fizzles, yet in this way picks up the weight of clarifying the solid association between moral decisions and inspiration.

Kosinskis Being There and the Existential Anti-Hero Essay -- Being Th

Kosinski's Being There and the Existential Anti-Hero   â Critics have alluded to Kosinski's Being There as his most noticeably terrible novel.â Perhaps, Kosinski's common style is misleading in its clear straightforwardness (particularly when stood out from The Painted Bird).â What Kosinski tries to do, as Welch D. Everman relates, is to animate the peruser's recreative and innovative errand by offering just the essentials...Kosinski's style brings the peruser into the occurrence by declining to permit him to stay uninvolved (25).â This article will suggest that Being There is a significant existential work following in the convention of Sartre and Camus in which Chance, the principle hero, reflects Camus' Mersault in A Happy Death and in which Koskinski shows the consistent movement of the existential screw-up.   â â â â â â â â â â An underlying reaction to Being There frequently may be to center upon the content as a sort of Creation account, or as a social parody, or maybe as a political scrutinize against broad communications and the TV generation.â While these readings are authentic, it appears that the beginning stage should focus on Kosinski's hero, Chance, so as to comprehend the all inclusive criticalness of the depiction of Chance, and verifiably the peruser, as victim.â Chance is a contemporary innocent.â Whether, as is regularly contended, he is slow-witted or not is irrelevant.â Rather, Chance essentially exists.â He sits in front of the TV, can't or reluctant to work inside recommended social ideal models, lastly, is basically a mirror, reflecting back to others sublimated pictures of wants anticipated onto him.   â â â â â â â â â â Chance is the American Everyman.â The occasions which come to pass for him could occur for anyone.â He, similar to us all, ha... ...en, David.â Camus.â Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1988.  Works Consulted Bruss, Paul.â Victims.â Lewisburg: Bucknell UP, 1981. Camus, Albert.â The Stranger.â New York: Vintage, 1946. Granofsky, Ronald.â Circle and Line: Modern and Postmodern Constructs of the Self in Jerzy Kosinski's The Painted Bird.â Essays in Literature 18.2 (1991): 254-68. Griffiths, Gareth.â Being there, being There: Postmodernism and Post-Colonialism: Kosinski and Malouf.â Ariel 20.4 (1989): 132-48. Grigbsy, John L.â Reflecting of America and Russia: Reflections of Tolstoy in Jerzy Kosinski's Being There.â Notes on Contemporary Literature 17.4 (1987): 6-8. Kosinski, Jerzy.â The Painted Bird.â New York: Bantam, 1978. Lavers, Norman.â Jerzy Kosinski.â Boston: Twayne, 1982. Piwinski, David J.â Kosinski's The Painted Bird.â The Explicator 40.1 (1981): 62-3.

The Zone Cell Challenge

The Zone Cell Challenge There are lots of things I should have been doing this weekend. Theres the 8 page draft paper that was due today. Or the 6.004 lab where I have to program a Turing machine its due Thursday. Or the revision of my design project which is due on Thursday (I actually still dont know what design Im going to write up). Or either of the psets in my other two classes which are both due on Friday. Yes, the weeks before Spring Break tend to suck. Like, not just your average suck. They tend to really suck. And with that much suck, I should have spent all weekend tooling and doing nothing else. But of course thats never how it works. Last weekend, I took the Zone Cell Challenge. Now, this is going to require a little background. Actually, theres quite a bit of background. Back In The Day, the MIT I/S Department (now IST) hired student developers to basically help build Athena. They were called the Watchmakers, based on a book by Niven Pournell (theres a page that explains the metaphor). The Watchmakers worked in the Watchmaker Zone, and to help them test, debug, and generally try to break the technologies they were developing, I/S donated three servers, which formed the ZONE Kerberos realm and the zone AFS cell. OkI guess I should take another step back and quickly explain Kerberos and AFS. Kerberos, named after the three-headed dog guard of Hades (usually seen as the Latin Cerberus), is a protocol for mutual authentication of a client and server through a trusted third party. Basically, you can prove who you are to other computers on the network, and your password never has to cross the network unencrypted. This works because theres a single machine that all other computers on the network trust, called the KDC. Kerberos is broken up into realms, which represent distinct sets of users and servers. The normal realm here on campus is the ATHENA.MIT.EDU realm, but there are also the CSAIL.MIT.EDU, MEDIA-LAB.MIT.EDU, and NUMENOR.MIT.EDU realms. AFS is the Andrew File System. Developed at Carnegie Mellon, AFS is a network accessible file system. Its a way of accessing your files from any computer on the Athena network. AFS is broken up into cells, and there are many more AFS cells than there are Kerberos realms. Like Kerberos, there is an athena.mit.edu cell. There are also csail.mit.edu and numenor.mit.edu cells. However, there is additionally, for example, the sipb.mit.edu cell, run by the SIPB. This allows SIPB to maintain its own servers and software and allocate quotas without having to go through the Athena maintainers. Soin addition to all of those cells and realms, theres the lesser known Zone Cell, made up of three servers (remember theyre for the Watchmakers): casio, seiko, and timex. If you look in the Zone Cell, youll see a series of very explicit rules. Ill copy some of the better ones: The Zone Cell is not for reliable data storage. The Zone Cell is not for reliable data storage. (in case you missed it the first time) ASO reserves the right to remove someones zone cell bits. Reasons this may be done include: [] gratuitously compromising the security of the zone cell or zone kerberos realm, or intentionally causing Rule 1, 2, or 10 to become relevant. [] The zone cell is not for reliable data storage. The zone cell is not for reliable data access. Sonow that weve established the reliability of the Zone Cell, what is the Zone Cell Challenge? The Zone Cell Challenge is an event that is usually for people interested in becoming SIPB AFS administrators. Its designed to help people become more familiar with how AFS and Kerberos work. In the Zone Cell Challenge, you start with root access to one of the three Zone Cell servers, and you have to accomplish three things. First, you have to give yourself root access to the other two Zone Cell servers. Second, you have to make yourself an administrator of the Zone AFS Cell (which is different from having root access on the servers!). Finally, you have to make yourself an admin of the Zone Kerberos Realm, which gives you permission to change other peoples passwords or create new accounts. It actually turns out that none of these tasks are particularly challenging if you read the right documentation. And since I was interested in learning more about how to administer AFS, I signed up for the Challenge on Friday night. And at about 3:45 AM, I actually started trying to hack the Zone Cell in earnest. The first part is easy, once you find the right command. It took me about 30 minutes to gain root access on all three servers. And then, almost immediately after I had logged in to all three to make sure it worked, all of them froze. And they stopped pinging. Wellcrud. What did I screw up? Well, fortunately, I didnt screw anything up. The Zone Cell servers had been moved to virtual machines, and all of the virtual machines on one server froze, including casio, seiko, and timex. Fortunately, there were other VMs on that machine that people cared about, and one of the Athena server maintainers brought the servers back up. One task down, two to go. Before about 6 AM I managed to finish the second task making myself an administrator of the Kerberos realm. I went to sleep, and when I woke up, I spent a couple of hours on the last task. The last task was also a little entertaining. I had a theory of how to make myself an AFS administrator, but I was worried that I would screw up the AFS users database. So I asked on the zone-cell zephyr class (kind of like a chatroom) Me: Ok. I think I know what I want to do [], but Id like to check and make sure Im not going to screw it up before I try. Anyone around? Someone from Athena server ops: I think you should just risk breaking it. At worse, youll just have to fix it after the fact Wellok? I guess Ill just back up the files Im modifying Anyway, I cant really say much more, because wheres the fun in saying what I did? But in any case, hacking other peoples servers with permission is a really fun way to spend a weekend. But I guess I should go back to tooling now

Useful Japanese Verbs

There are two kinds of verbs in Japanese, (1) the be-verbs, da or desu, and (2) common verbs ending with the ~ u sound. As for the be-verbs (is, are, am), da is used for the informal present tense and desu is for the formal present tense. There is no grammatical subject-verb agreement in Japanese. Da is used for the present tense of the to be-verb (is, are, am) regardless of the person and number of the subject. For example, it is used in all of the following three situations like, I am a student (Watashi wa gakusei da), He is a student (Kare wa gakusei da) and We are students (Watashitachi wa gakusei da). Beside the be-verbs, all other verbs in Japanese end with the vowel ~ u. Japanese verbs conjugate according to the suffixes that is attached to the verb stem. Verb endings are changed to indicate past tense, negation, passive and causative mood. The rules for conjugation in Japanese verbs are simpler compared to some languages, such as English or French. The conjugation patterns are not affected by gender, a person (such as the first, second, and third person), or the number (singular and plural). Here is a list of the basic Japanese verbs and their pronunciation. I focus on the non-past tense in my list. It is the plain form that is used in informal situations. It is also the form listed in dictionaries. It is equivalent to both future and past tense in English. (there) is; be; havearu㠁‚ã‚‹ be (for living things)iru㠁„ã‚‹ do; makesuru㠁™ã‚‹ do; performokonauè ¡Å'㠁† make; manufacturetsukuruä ½Å"ã‚‹ be possible; ready; good atdekiru㠁 §Ã£  Ã£â€šâ€¹ beginhajimaruÃ¥ §â€¹Ã£  ¾Ã£â€šâ€¹ raise​okosuè µ ·Ã£ â€œÃ£ â„¢ continuetsuzukuç ¶Å¡Ã£   repeatkurikaesuç ¹ °Ã£â€šÅ Ã¨ ¿â€Ã£ â„¢ stoptomaruæ ­ ¢Ã£  ¾Ã£â€šâ€¹ give upyameruã‚„ã‚ Ã£â€šâ€¹ omithabukuçÅ" Ã£   finishowaruç µâ€šÃ£â€š Ã£â€šâ€¹ endsumuæ ¸Ë†Ã£â€šâ‚¬ advance; progresssusumué€ ²Ã£â€šâ‚¬ be late​okurerué â€¦Ã£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ increasefueruÃ¥ ¢â€"㠁ˆã‚‹ decreaseheruæ ¸â€ºÃ£â€šâ€¹ be left over; have spareamaruä ½â„¢Ã£â€šâ€¹ remainnokoruæ ®â€¹Ã£â€šâ€¹ sufficetariruè ¶ ³Ã£â€šÅ Ã£â€šâ€¹ lack; be short ofkakeruæ ¬  Ã£ â€˜Ã£â€šâ€¹ crosskosuè ¶Å Ã£ â„¢ goikuè ¡Å'㠁  comekuruæ  ¥Ã£â€šâ€¹ go outderuå‡ ºÃ£â€šâ€¹ enterhairuå… ¥Ã£â€šâ€¹ take outdasuå‡ ºÃ£ â„¢ put inireruå… ¥Ã£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ return; come backkaeruÃ¥ ¸ °Ã£â€šâ€¹ asktazuneru㠁Ÿã Å¡Ã£  ­Ã£â€šâ€¹ answerkotaeruç ­â€Ã£ Ë†Ã£â€šâ€¹ mentionnoberuè ¿ °Ã£  ¹Ã£â€šâ€¹ make noisesawagué ¨â€™Ã£   shinehikaru光る stand outmedatsuç› ®Ã§ «â€¹Ã£  ¤ appeararawareruç  ¾Ã£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ openakeruéâ€"‹ã â€˜Ã£â€šâ€¹ closeshimeruéâ€"‰ã‚ Ã£â€šâ€¹ giveageru㠁‚㠁’ã‚‹ receivemorauもら㠁† taketoruÃ¥ â€"ã‚‹ catch​tsukamaeruæ â€¢Ã£  ¾Ã£ Ë†Ã£â€šâ€¹ geteruÃ¥ ¾â€"ã‚‹ loseushinauÃ¥ ¤ ±Ã£ â€  look forsagasuæŽ ¢Ã£ â„¢ findmitsukeruè ¦â€¹Ã£  ¤Ã£ â€˜Ã£â€šâ€¹ pick uphirouæ‹ ¾Ã£ â€  throw awaysuteruæ  ¨Ã£  ¦Ã£â€šâ€¹ dropochiruè  ½Ã£  ¡Ã£â€šâ€¹ usetsukauä ½ ¿Ã£ â€  handle, treatatsukauæ‰ ±Ã£ â€  carryhakobué â€¹Ã£  ¶ hand overwatasuæ ¸ ¡Ã£ â„¢ deliverkubarué… Ã£â€šâ€¹ returnkaesuè ¿â€Ã£ â„¢ approachyoruÃ¥ ¯â€žÃ£â€šâ€¹ crosswataruæ ¸ ¡Ã£â€šâ€¹ passtooru通る hurryisoguæ€ ¥Ã£   run awaynigerué€Æ'㠁’ã‚‹ chaseouè ¿ ½Ã£ â€  hidekakureruéš  Ã£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ lose ones waymayouè ¿ ·Ã£ â€  waitmatsuÃ¥ ¾â€¦Ã£  ¤ moveutsuruç § »Ã£â€šâ€¹ turn; facemukuÃ¥ â€˜Ã£   riseagaruä ¸Å Ã£ Å'ã‚‹ go downsagaruä ¸â€¹Ã£ Å'ã‚‹ incline; leankatamukuå‚ ¾Ã£   shake; swayyureruæ  ºÃ£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ fall downtaoreru倒ã‚Å'ã‚‹ hitataruÃ¥ ½â€œÃ£ Å¸Ã£â€šâ€¹ collidebutsukaru㠁 ¶Ã£  ¤Ã£ â€¹Ã£â€šâ€¹ separate from; leavehanarerué› ¢Ã£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ meetauä ¼Å¡Ã£ â€  run into; meet by chancedeauå‡ ºÃ¤ ¼Å¡Ã£ â€  welcomemukaeruè ¿Å½Ã£ Ë†Ã£â€šâ€¹ send offmiokuruè ¦â€¹Ã©â‚¬ Ã£â€šâ€¹ take with; accompanytsureteikué€ £Ã£â€šÅ'㠁 ¦Ã¨ ¡Å'㠁  call; send foryobuå‘ ¼Ã£  ¶ pay; supply; put backosameruç ´ Ã£â€š Ã£â€šâ€¹ put; leaveokuç ½ ®Ã£   line up; queuenarabuä ¸ ¦Ã£  ¶ settle; tidy upmatomeru㠁 ¾Ã£  ¨Ã£â€š Ã£â€šâ€¹ collectatsumaru集㠁 ¾Ã£â€šâ€¹ dividewakeru分㠁‘ã‚‹ dispersechiruæ• £Ã£â€šâ€¹ be disorderedmidareruä ¹ ±Ã£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ be rough; stormyareruè â€™Ã£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ extendhirogaruÃ¥ ºÆ'㠁Å'ã‚‹ spreadhiromaruÃ¥ ºÆ'㠁 ¾Ã£â€šâ€¹ swell; inflatefukuramu㠁 µÃ£  Ã£â€šâ€°Ã£â€šâ‚¬ attach; turn ontsukuä »ËœÃ£   go out; put out; erasekieruæ ¶Ë†Ã£ Ë†Ã£â€šâ€¹ pile up; loadtsumuç © Ã£â€šâ‚¬ pile upkasanerué‡ Ã£  ­Ã£â€šâ€¹ press down; suppressosaeruæŠ ¼Ã£ Ë†Ã£â€šâ€¹ place (thing) betweenhasamu㠁 ¯Ã£ â€¢Ã£â€šâ‚¬ stick; paste onharuè ² ¼Ã£â€šâ€¹ put togetherawaseruÃ¥ Ë†Ã£â€š Ã£ â€ºÃ£â€šâ€¹ bendmagaruæ› ²Ã£ Å'ã‚‹ break; snaporu折る be torn; tearyabureruç   ´Ã£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ break; destroykowareruÃ¥ £Å Ã£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ get well; correctnaoruç› ´Ã£â€šâ€¹ tiemusubuç µ Ã£  ¶ bind; tieshibaruç ¸â€ºÃ£â€šâ€¹ wind; coilmakuÃ¥ · »Ã£   surroundkakomuå› ²Ã£â€šâ‚¬ turn; rotatemawaru回る hangkakeru掛㠁‘ã‚‹ decoratekazarué £ ¾Ã£â€šâ€¹ take out; outstripnukuæŠÅ"㠁  be disconnected; come offhazureru㠁 ¯Ã£ Å¡Ã£â€šÅ'ã‚‹ become slack; loosenyurumuゆるむ leakmoreruã‚‚ã‚Å'ã‚‹ dryhosuÃ¥ ¹ ²Ã£ â„¢ be soakedhitasuæ µ ¸Ã£ â„¢ mixmajiruæ · ·Ã£ ËœÃ£â€šâ€¹ extend; stretchnobiruä ¼ ¸Ã£  ³Ã£â€šâ€¹ shrink; shortenchijimuç ¸ ®Ã£â€šâ‚¬ include; containfukumuÃ¥  «Ã£â€šâ‚¬ want; neediru㠁„ã‚‹ ask for; wantmotomeruæ ±â€šÃ£â€š Ã£â€šâ€¹ show; indicateshimesuç ¤ ºÃ£ â„¢ examine; investigateshiraberuè ª ¿Ã£  ¹Ã£â€šâ€¹ make suretashikameruç ¢ ºÃ£ â€¹Ã£â€š Ã£â€šâ€¹ recognize; approvemitomeruè ª Ã£â€š Ã£â€šâ€¹

I Will Talk About My Philosophy Of Education - 1890 Words

Introduction: Henry Brooks Adams once said, â€Å"A teacher affects eternity; he can never tell where his influence stops† (NEA). In my mind, this is a very powerful line, and it hits the nail right on the head. Each individual in this country will be affected by teachers at least until they reach the age of sixteen, so it is important for teachers to shape our future generations. In this paper, I will first discuss what the purpose of education is, and why it is so important in this world. Then, I will talk about what my philosophy of education is, as well as some sources to explain it. Next, I will talk about what motivated me to become a teacher, which was a turning point in my life. Finally, I will talk about the vision of CIA in education,†¦show more content†¦Education not only affects families, cities, or states, but its affects the whole universe. Philosophy: My philosophy of education is progressivism or also known as pragmatism. Progressivism can be known as an educational philosophy that stresses active learning through problem solving, projects, and hands-on experiences (Koch, 2014). This view on education was coined by John Dewey. He believed students should not only be learning content in school, but they should also be learning it through a hands-on process and their interests must be the driving force behind their classroom projects and experiences (Koch, 2014). This approach prepares students for their futures by teaching them responsibility for everyday life and how to be problem solvers. Dewey agrees that creating well-rounded individuals is important, but in his mind, we should use peoples’ differences to their own advantage (Ilica, 2017). Educators should focus on each students’ strengths and push them in the direction of what they love to do, instead of teaching them concepts they are not interested in. The ideas of progressivism in my mind are essential to produce effective, successful people in today’s society. Life is going to throw curveballs at everyone, but the most important part is how individuals react to those curve balls. Progressivism’s idea of teaching problem solving prepares individuals for the various â€Å"curve balls† in life. Also, progressivism teaches students what they are good at and, moreShow MoreRelatedMy Philosophy of Education Essay1723 Words   |  7 Pages I believe that when students are comfortable, whether it be with a teacher or just a setting, they will learn much more quickly. Therefore, I think that it is extremely important to create an environment that is safe and comfortable for the students. Because of the â€Å"laid back† atmosphere, I think that my model for discipline would fall under the umbrella of constructivism. The reason is that I believe that students need to be able to learn in a way that relates to their lives in the presentRead MoreEssay on Teaching Philosophy Statement1058 Words   |  5 PagesTeaching Philosophy Statement Do you have a philosophy on education? I do. What I want to discuss is my personal view of education. I’m going to talk about the nature of students. I am going to talk about the nature of knowledge and whether or not it is absolute or relative. The purpose of education, the method, and the curriculum will be discussed also. We are going to look at some of my philosophical views on education and my professional development plans. When I am throughRead MoreLeadership Philosophy : Leadership And Coaching Philosophy1621 Words   |  7 PagesLeadership Coaching Philosophy If we want to study and explain a leadership and coaching philosophy. We have to know really well what a philosophy means. Philosophy is a theory or attitude held by a person or organization that acts as a guiding principle for behavior. Philosophy is defined as the rational investigation of the truths and principles of being, knowledge, or conduct (Mertz, 2014). Furthermore we need to know about what being a leader means. Leadership is having a vision, sharing thatRead MoreMy Philosophy Of Higher Education1118 Words   |  5 PagesHigher education is a daunting challenge that everyone goes through. It’s the type of challenge that can lift your spirits, but at the same time it can bring you down. When I think of higher education I think of one word: stress. Where does philosophy fit in? First off, what does philosophy mean? Philosophy can mean many things to different people. It can be a belief. It can be an attitude. It can be whatever you want it to be. For me a philosophy and higher education go hand in hand. I’m very committedRead More My Philosophy of Education Essay1168 Words   |  5 PagesMy philosophy of Education The word philosophy is described in the dictionary as the search for human life. There are many different aspects of philosophy: ethics and logic are the main two along with aesthetics, epistemology, and metaphysics. I shall be discussing two of the five in my paper. As a professional educator, I have many different views that I will use for my long term goals and in my teaching profession. The first area of discussion is the nature of theRead MorePhilosophy : The Philosophical Study Of Human Values, Epistemology, And Metaphysics1069 Words   |  5 PagesBefore taking this class, I thought that philosophy was strictly the study of space and abstract ideas that I never really gave any attention to. Now at the end of the semester I can say that not only have I realized how wrong my original opinion of philosophy was, but I also learned that the more philosophy I can study, the better I will be able to make decisions in my life. Philosophy can be broken down into three branches: Axiology, Epistemology, and Metaphysics. These branches each have theirRead MoreMy Philosophy of Early Childhood Education Essay1427 Words   |  6 PagesMy philosophy of Early childhood education is based on research that indicates that a child’s growth is developmental. Every child is unique in terms of life experiences, developmental readiness, and cultural heritage. A hig h quality early childhood program that provides a safe and nurturing environment, which promotes physical, social, emotional, language and cognitive development will ensure a positive continuation of the child’s education process In my philosophy I will talk about the goalsRead MoreTeaching Education For Students Of All Ages, Genders, Ethnicities, And Differences987 Words   |  4 PagesI believe that there are many different techniques and strategies to connect with students of all ages, genders, ethnicities, and differences in learning. Educational philosophies are the foundation of education and how it influences students learning in classrooms. All teachers have their own belief on how education should be taught, I will express my thoughts to how I will provide education to my students. The purpose of education, three to four educational philosophies I plan to use, and why teachingRead MoreI Loved Learning About Locke And His Philosophy747 Words   |  3 PagesI loved learning about Locke and his philosophy’s because he mainly focused on the child’s character. He focused on who the child was becoming as a person rather than focusing on what the child was doing. Locke’s educational p hilosophy had six main points, first of them being Self-Control. He taught about how we need to focus on the child’s physical health, and how to be firm with them if we want them to acquire self -discipline (Crane pg 9). The second point is, Best Rewards and Punishments whichRead MoreMy Most Valued Learning Experiences977 Words   |  4 Pages My most valued learning experiences have been with the discussions of each module; I learned so much from my fellow students about their views and beliefs. It was a very wonderful experience reading about what they think and then replying to them, as well as, the replies I received from my fellow students about my statements. My fellow students beliefs were very interesting and understandable, and if we disagreed with a viewpoint they were not rude but instead very courteous. Instead, they

Goal Line Technology in Soccer Free Essays

A global audience of 3. 2 billion people – about 46. 4% of the world population – watched the World Cup tournament of 2010, according to FIFA, the world governing body of soccer. We will write a custom essay sample on Goal Line Technology in Soccer or any similar topic only for you Order Now The final between Spain and The Netherlands alone had an audience of approximately 530 million. There is little debate about which sport is more played and watched more than any other. It unites and divides cities and countries. It sparks debate and controversy, which is discussed within families, with co-workers, and even between heads of state. At present, the most pressing issue facing the sport is whether to introduce goal line technology, computerized technology to definitely determine the scoring of a goal. This is not a new problem. According to the rules of the game, a goal should be awarded when the whole ball crosses the goal line. However, there have been many high profile cases when the officials have made the wrong decision and awarded a goal – or failed to award a goal. In such a low scoring game as soccer, where teams typically score one to two goals per game, it can mean the difference between winning and losing a game. During an important tournament, it can mean winning or losing the biggest prize of them all: the World Cup. For example, in the 1966 World Cup final between a very closely matched England and West Germany sides, the game went into thirty minutes of extra time with the scores level after the normal ninety minute period. Then Alan Ball crossed the ball to England’s main striker, Geoff Hurst, who controlled and ball and shot towards the goal. The ball beat the German goalkeeper and crashed on the underside of the bar, sending it crashing down towards the goal line. Tofik Bakhramov, the watching Russian linesman (actually a common misconception, as he was actually from the then Soviet state of Azerbaijan) indicated to the referee it was a goal, believing that the whole ball had crossed the white line. The goal was given and it changed the match. England went on to win the game and seal the country’s greatest ever sporting triumph. However, based on the TV footage and photographs of the incident, the common unbiased conception is that it bounced on the line and therefore the goal should not have been awarded. For years now the technology to judge whether the whole ball has crossed the goal line has existed. There are two well known systems: Sony’s Hawk-Eye and the German alternative, GoalRef. Hawk-Eye is well known to cricket and tennis fans and has been used to great success in both sports, accurately showing where the ball landed in tennis, and predicting the flight of the ball in cricket. In soccer it could judge whether the ball crossed the goal line with a high level of accuracy. The second option – Goalref – places sensors inside the ball and goalposts, which categorically determine the exact location of the ball when near the goal. So why hasn’t the world’s most populous sport embraced technology? Surely this technology would improve the game and make it fair for everyone? Well, it isn’t as simple as it appears. In fact FIFA have found itself in a quagmire. If they introduce technology now at this late stage in 2012 they will be seen as being slow to react to important problems; resist technology and they will only exacerbate the problem in the future. The game’s hierarchy has, until recently, been largely against the introduction of technology. FIFA spends hundreds of millions of dollars worldwide investing in the game at grass roots level, determined to ensure football keeps its universal appeal by being played by all people on a level playing field. In short, FIFA wants a group of children playing on the beach in Brazil to essentially be playing the same game as Barcelona versus Real Madrid in the Champions League Final. Moreover, the governing body fears the introduction of technology will lead to a ‘slippery slope’ whereby technology will be used in many aspects of the game, drastically changing the flow of the game. Michel Platini, head of the very influential European governing body UEFA, is one such example of the resistance of technology. Platini says, â€Å"we will see. As for technology, I don’t think it’s good for football. Maybe goal line technology, but that would be the first step towards the introduction of technology in all areas of the game. I’m still very much against it and, to be honest, I’m not going to change my mind at the age of 57. † Instead, Platini has implemented a new system whereby five referees are used instead of the standard three officials. This, he argues, has eradicated the problem of ‘ghost goals’ citing Marko Devic’s ‘goal’ for Ukraine in the 2012 European Championships as being ‘the only error’ in the last three years. Like most soccer fans, I love debating the game with family, friends and co-workers. I thrive on the controversy. When England midfielder Frank Lampard ‘scored’ for England against Germany in the 2010 World Cup (the ball was clearly over the line but the spin of it made it bounce back out of the goal and the game played on) I was on my feet shouting at the referee for not giving the clear goal. Equally, when the aforementioned Ukrainian striker Marko Devic’s shot clearly went over the goal line and neither the referee nor linemen saw it, I was smiling to myself thanking our good fortunate. In both cases it would have probably changed the match – and the tournament. After the match endless experts and pundits argued the issue. Essentially the controversy had inadvertently created an even greater spectacle. As much as I love the debates, I think it is now time to move forward. There is too much money involved and the reputation and credibility of the game is at stake. I believe FIFA have an obligation and responsibility to introduce goal line technology – and the sooner the better. It should proceed with caution though. The ball crossing the line is definitive. In essence, the whole ball either completely crossed the white line or it didn’t. It isn’t open to interpretation like, say, whether a player has committed a foul. It is my belief that FIFA, while embracing this technology, should oppose further technological advances in the game, especially when it comes to subjective decisions. Football is a fast-paced game and breaks in the continuity would drastically change the game for the worse. Goal line technology has been proven to work quickly and effectively ensuring it will have minimal negative effect. In conclusion, I acknowledge the problem of whether to introduce goal line technology is a divisive issue. I can see the argument from both sides. However, I do not agree with the current policy of stalling on the issue and delaying technological change or the over-complicated idea of bringing in more assistant referees, as suggested by Michel Platini. Instead, it is my belief that it is time for FIFA to embrace change and bring goal line technology into the â€Å"beautiful game. † How to cite Goal Line Technology in Soccer, Essay examples

Pro Animal Testing Essay Example For Students

Pro Animal Testing Essay This theme song to a popular cartoon is a farce dealing with experiments carried out on animals. In the cartoon one mouse is made very smart and wants to take over the world while the other is clearly not as smart. While the cartoon makes jokes, the reality is that mice and other animals re being used for medical tests every day. For some people this testing brings up ethical questions. One of the biggest questions: is it really necessary to take the lives of animals in the name of science and for the betterment of humanity? For animal rights activists, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the answer is no. PETA pressures labs into halting experiments because they believe that animals are not to be used by humans for food, clothing, entertainment, or to experiment on (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals 1). Its stance is that any testing is painful, inhumane, and unnecessary when alternatives are available. The PETA website says that animals, like humans, have interests that cannot be sacrificed or traded away simply because it might benefit others. (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals 2-3). Essentially, PETA is of the opinion that animals and humans should have identical rights. In their press releases PETA puts out pictures of rabbits with open flesh wounds and dogs with rashes on their skinsall in an attempt to disgust people into sympathy for their cause. In actuality the number of lab animals used has been cut in half in the last 25 years (James-Enger 254). Of the animals used, 90 percent are rats and mice (James-Enger 1). Moreover, 11 million animals die each year in animal shelters (Americans for Medical Progress 2) and an astounding 95 percent of the animals that die in America do so from human consumption (James-Enger 254). The reason that animal testing is appropriate is that there are regulations in place to minimize testing and pain, the alternatives are insufficient for now, and most importantly the information obtained from experimentation is irreplaceable. While animal rights groups such as PETA advocate abolishing all animal testing that inflicts pain on animals, proponents of testing cite laws and regulations which minimize pain and discomfort. PETAs position is based on the belief that humans are not superior to animals (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). The vice president of the Humans Society of the United States (HSUS), an animal rights group that is nearly as extreme as PETA, has been quoted as saying the life of an ant and that of my child should be granted equal consideration (Americans for Medical Progress 2). If, as PETA and HSUS say, animal and human life is equal, then putting an animal through any pain is immoral. However, there are laws in place to minimize discomfort and inhumane treatment. The laws limit the amount of distress and pain an animal is subjected to. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the body that governs animal testing, must approve all tests (United States Department of Agriculture 2). The USDA must also authorize the numbers and types of animals experimented on (United States Department of Agriculture 2). Tests can no longer be performed if conclusive data is already available. In 1991 it was discovered that Procter and Gamble had performed experiments on 300 guinea pigs when the data the tests was to obtain was already available (Animal Testing by the Cosmetic Industry 2). This is just one of the situations that newer animal testing legislation would have prevented or at least deterred. A fifty-point criterion for assessing pain is in place (United States Department of Agriculture 3). These points include everything from vocalization of pain to apparent depression. If there is no clear criteria then it is assumed that procedures that cause pain in humans also cause pain in animals (United States Department of Agriculture 50). A Lesson Before Dying Essay Murray, M.D. said, Animal experimentation has been essential to the development of all cardiac surgery, transplantation surgery, joint replacements and all vaccinations (Americans for Medical Progress 1). The numbers to back up this claim are that over 440,000 open-heart surgeries are performed and 11,000 kidneys are transplanted every year, not to mention that animal experimentation has made possible the salvation of 20,000 kidney dialysis patients each year (Botting 1). Also, the ability to test on animals has made possible the relatively safe and successful use of dangerous chemotherapy drugs to treat cancer (Americans for Medical Progress 1). Drugs such as this cannot be tested on humans because of their strength and potential for killing in inappropriate doses. If the proper dosage were not known, the results would be inaccurate and could be lethal. Many antibiotics and vaccines used today were developed and tested through animal research, as were insulin to control diabetes and nearly all modern anesthetics (Botting 1). It is hard to imagine life without some of these lifesaving drugs, or even the ones that do not save lives, just make life a little more bearable. It is likewise significant to note that animal testing has benefited animals as well. When a pet owner takes his or her animal to the veterinarian to receive shots, chances are that those shots are available because of animal experimentation. Heartworm, feline leukemia, rabies, anthrax, and tetanus are all preventable because of animal testing. PETA and HSUS are honorable institutions with admirable goals, but they are over idealistic and overzealous. That fact can best be described by the following quote: Animal rights activists blocked for two years research aimed at stopping transmission of HIV from mother to child. That research ultimately demonstrated how AZT can prevent babies from getting AIDS (Americans for Medical Progress). Sometimes the good of the many outweighs the good of the few. This does not mean that animal testing should go unchecked. Suffering is kept to a minimum by legislation and advancements in testing alternatives. As these alternatives progress, the number of live animals needed for testing will gradually decrease and eventually the need for them will hopefully be eliminated. But in the meantime, animal testing is too important to stop. The benefits waiting to be had are too important and any possible drawbacks are too insignificant to allow a halt in animal research. BibliographyBibliographyAnimal Testing by the Cosmetic Industry. (20 March 1999). Animal Research Saves Human and Animal Lives. Americans for Medical Progress. (20 March 1999). Animal Research Holds the Key to Saving Human Lives. Americans for Medical Progress. (20 March 1999). Ball, Matt and Anne Green, and Jack Norris. Veganism as the Path to Animal Liberation. The Animals Agenda Sep/Oct 1998: 44-45. Botting, Jack H. and Adrian R. Morrison. Animal Research is Vital to Medicine. Scientific American. 187 February 1997: 83-85. D. E. Skin Stand-Ins. Scientific American. September 1990: 168. James-Enger, Kelly. Beyond Animal Testing. Vegetarian Times. October 1998: 254. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (20 March 1999). 21 Things You May Not Know About the Animal Rights Movement. Americans for Medical Progress. (20 March 1999). U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Animal Welfare Report Fiscal Year 1997.